What is Gravitation?

First published in 2005 in Germany in "Innovative Physik"

The following animation shows which lane an arrow takes, which is shot sideways into a falling water wall.
It shows, how the arrow takes on the same trajectory as if it were shot in the air. But to the line in the water wall one would say, that the arrow would go down by the falling water wall. On the other hand, in the air one says that the force of attraction deflects the arrow downwards.
What does the position of the arrow indicate? In the water wall it retains its initial direction. In the air, however, it would take the direction of the trajectory, since the arrow is always directed in the direction of movement.
But if the arrow were to be shot from the surface of the moon in the same way, it would maintain its upward direction as in the wall of water.

What conclusions can be drawn from these facts?
The arrow basically follows Newton's laws of inertia. It is moving forward, caused by a pulse with constant speed and direction
In the falling water wall arises the well known ballistic by adding with the movement of the falling water wall. Based on the falling water, ie into the water, the arrow still moves straight ahead. If one falls with the water in the water one can see, how the arrow flitting past one in a straight line.

The result:
In the coordinate system of the water the arrow moves straight ahead and with constant speed,
in the coordinate system of the earth's surface, the arrow moves on a ballistic line, a so-called geodesic.

The prediction:
Just as the arrow is dragged down by the wall of water with its straight Newtonian motion in it, it is even taken down on the moon by a something, what is equally falling, an
invisible "something". The water wall only visibly makes it clear, that a falling "something" is leading the arrow to its crooked ballistic orbit, even though it follows Newton's laws of inertia.

The existence of an attraction force has already been ruled out by Newton himself, and even today, after nearly three hundred years, it has still not been proven. The attraction force theory is an only logical and credible explanation for the phenomenon of that, that bodies accelerate downwards. But: it looks only like a force, that is acting down bodies. Between appearance and being, however, there are sometimes worlds, as here too. Only mathematically calculations come with the fictional attraction to the right results. But not only by this theory, but three others, what can not be. Mathematical results are no proof for physical correctness!
Physical theories must be able to answer questions and not provide arithmetic values. Already Richard Feynman (Nobel Prize for Physics 1965) stated, that mathematics is not physics. A gravitational theory must for example answer the question, why the gravitational effect decreases quadratically to the distance. If it can not do that,
is it alone by that reason completely mistaken. The previous only knowledge, that this is so, is still no confirmation, so real knowledge, why that is so. The attraction theory as well as the theory of general relativity as a theory of gravitation can not answer this, so they are not correct.

The second example of the gravitational effect is a jumper in a swimming pool.
In the following animation he jumps from a springboard. The blue line shows the direction of the Newtonian line of inertia, in which the jumper would move away from the Earth's surface if there were no gravity.
Gravitation is an invisible something, that falls down and carries body with it like the animation of the falling water wall shows. This "something" also takes the jumper down with its Newtonian inertial line, now marked red. The red vector arrow at the springer's center of gravity is its constant velocity on the inertial line.
In the water wall, the process is obvious, but in the air or on the moon in a vacuum? The latter, the vacuum, is the content-laden keyword. It is absolutely certain, even from Einstein, that there is no vacuum. There is something in the empty room! But this is not material in the sense that it has an inertia. It is sometimes referred to as energy. But energy has the meaning of an equivalence between energy and mass. And that is why there exist an interaction between ether and bodies, namely the entrainment of the bodies during movements of the ether.

The guesswork of the invisible, but effective vacuum dissolves itself, if the ether will be accepted, that Einstein banished from physics. The Hafele-Keating experiment proves, that the ether really exists. But Einstein can not comment this, because he died before this experiment. So he can not more correcting his mistake. After him no one dares to shake his doctrines anymore, a believing science without independent thinking.

The existence of the ether is also proved by some other measurements, even by the Michelson-Morley experiment
. The ether is an unknown substance (possibly it also consists Higgs particles) without inertia, invisible but effective and filling the whole space of the universe up to the rooms beetween electrons and nucleus of atoms! Ether is the expanding "cloud", the foundation of our universe. It is also spoken from a "Dirac Lake", which is a good comparison for the ether.
The electrons of atoms must also move opposite to it, just as the whole atom with its movements and we too with our movements. The falling water wall is also carried along by the ether falling into the earth like the arrow in it. Why the ether flows into celestrial bodies, so masses, still needs to be
explored.

The whole process of jumping from the springboard can be described as follows: the jumper follows Newtonian physics just like the falling ether as the basis of the Newtonian physics.
The zero point of the world is the ether! And this "fixed point" unfortunately moves into celestial bodies. This puts us in a position, where we are trigonometrically, except for the earth's rotation and the course of the earth around the sun, to the starry sky at rest, but for the observation of the gravitational effect in a completely inappropriate place. We observe the falling of other bodies from a state of acceleration upward. so not only from a movement, but even from an acceleration!

Einstein placed the observation point as a fix point by a falling body, because that one is free of accelerations, that means free of forces and developed out of this his general theory of relativity. Unfortunately he did a lapse: he forgot, that a reference body must not only be free of acceleration, but also free of any other motions!

The fall curve visible from the earth's surface is fictitious. It is as fictitious as the observation, that the sun revolves around the earth. The Earth's surface is far away from being able to detect absolute movements of objects in the cosmos, that means to be a reference point for physical processes. Technically, however, the earth's surface can be taken as a reference point, because it only calculates with only incremental difference values and non absolute values.

The absolute way of the the jumper travels is that against the ether, made visible by the red line. So although the path of the jumper is the parabola from Earth's point of view, in reality it only covers the straight path on the red line. This distance is therefore the shortest possible between jump and dive into the water. From this, pragmatically mathematical (that means without a physical bottom of the pants) was created the so-called minimal-motion-theory
for gravitation according to Hamilton's principle. Their results are correct, but without the knowledge of why.

The ether is the zero point of the world! Movements towards it are all, that happens in the cosmos by Newtonian physics. And there is no other physics! Gravitational processes, that is falling on celestial bodies, are movements of the ether, that is the fixed point of the world and therefore also for the Newtonian physics. However, this requires a new way of thinking. The earth soaks up ether like a vacuum cleaner, which leads to the gravitational time dilation and the non-existent airstream of the ether on its orbit around the sun. The ether does not make the rotation of the earth except for a tiny bit after the Lense-Thirring effect.