What is Gravitation?

First published in 2005 in Germany in "Innovative Physik"

The following animation shows which lane an arrow takes, which is shot sideways into a falling water wall.
What is special about it?
It shows, how the arrow takes on the same trajectory as if it were shot in the air. But to the orbit in the water wall one would say that the arrow would go down with the falling water wall. On the other hand, in the air, one say, that the force of attraction deflects the arrow downwards.
What does the direction of the arrow indicate? In the water wall it retains its initial direction. In the air, however, he would take the direction of the trajectory, because the control surfaces at the arrows end ensure that the arrow is always directed in the direction of movement into it.
If the arrow woud be shot from the moon in the same way, it would maintain its upward direction as in the wall of the water.

What conclusions can be drawn with these facts?
The arrow basically follows Newton's laws of inertia. That is to say, it is moving forward with a constant speed and direction and energy due to its launcher direction.
The water wall adds its own moving to that of the arrow. Compared to the falling water, ie in the water, the arrow still move straight ahead. If one fall with the water wall, he would see the arrow flitting past him in a straight line.

The result:
In the coordinate system of the water the arrow moves straight ahead and with constant speed,
In the coordinate system of the earth's surface, the arrow moves on a ballistic line, a so-called geodesic.

The prediction:
Just as the arrow is dragged down by the wall of water with its straight Newtonian motion in it, it is even taken down on the moon by an equally falling invisible thing like the waterwall on the earth.
The water wall makes visible, that a falling "something" must be there, to force all things into a ballistic trajectory. Even though they follows Newton's laws of inertia.

The very existence of attraction has already been ruled out by Newton himself, and even today, after nearly three hundred years, it has still not been proven. Attraction theory is  only a logical and credible explanation that bodies accelerate downwards: It looks only like a force, which is acting bodies down.
The problem is, that calculations with dithe attraction theorie are right. But calculations of quite different theories, such as pressure theory, minimal way theory, field theory and the general theory of relativity arise also correct results. And that can not be!
In natur belong to one phenomenon only one cause!
Between appearance and being, however, there are sometimes worlds, as here too.
Correct calulations are therefore no physical proofs! Physical theories must be able to answer questions and not provide only arithmetic values. Already Richard Feynman (Nobel Prize for Physics 1965) stated that mathematics is not physics. A gravitational theory would have to answer especially the question, why the gravitational effect decreases quadratically to the distance.
If a theory can that not, it is completely wrong, only by that reason alone. The previous only knowledge, that something is so,,how it is, is still no knowledge, why it is so. The attraction theory as well as the theory of general relativity as a theory of gravitation can not answer this, so they are not correct. All previous theories can not answer the question, so they are definitely wrong.
A phyically theory is either completely
right or fundamently wrong. There is nothing between them.

The second example of the gravitational effect is a jumper in the swimming pool.
In the following animation he jumps from a springboard. The blue line shows the direction of the Newtonian line of inertia, in which the jumper would move away from the Earth's surface if there were no gravity.
Gravitation is an invisible something, that falls down and carries body with it as it animates the falling water wall. This something also takes the jumper with his Newtonian inertial line, now marked red, with him down. The red vector arrow at the springer's center of gravity is its constant velocity on the inertial line.
In the water wall, the process of gravitation is obvious, but in the air or on the moon in a vacuum? The latter, the vacuum, is the content-laden keyword. It is absolutely certain, even from Einstein, that there is no vacuum. There is something in the empty room! But this is not material in the sense that it has an inertia. It is sometimes referred to as energy, which gives an indication of at least something effective about the energy-mass equivalence. And it is effective, because this invisible filling of the universe has the effect, to take with any material with inertia.

The riddle of the invisible but effective thing in the vacuum dissolves, if the ether, that Einstein banished from physics, will be accepted. The Hafele-Keating experiment proves that it really exists. Einstein can not comment on this, because he had died before this experiment. He could have corrected his mistake. After him no one dares to doubt his doctrines anymore, a believing science without independent thinking. Richard Feynman said in his Book
"The Pleasure af Finding Things Out": Of all scientific subjects, only the natural sciences contain the doctrine of how dangerous it is, to believe in the infallibility of the greatest teachers of the preceding generation. This also applies for Einstein.

The ether is proven by the Hafele-Keating experiment and some more. It is an unknown substance (possibly it also consists of Higgs particles) without inertia, invisible but effective and filling the whole space of the universe up to into the atoms! It is the expanding "cloud" that represents our universe. The electrons of the atoms must also move against it, just as the whole atom and we too. The falling water wall is also taken with by the falling ether into the earth like the arrow in it. Why the ether flows into celestial bodies, so masses, still needs to be explored 

The whole process of jumping from the springboard can be described as follows: the jumper follows Newtonian physics, but with the falling ether as the basis of the material world. The zero point of the world is the ether! And this "fixed point" unfortulately moves into celestial bodies. Therefore we are in a position, where we are trigonometrically, except for the earth's rotation and the course of the earth around the sun, to the starry sky at rest, but for the observation of the gravitational effect in a completely inappropriate place. We observe the falling of other bodies out of a state of acceleration upward. so not only from a movement, but even from an acceleration.
Einstein believed, that he had found the right fixed point of the world in a falling body, since it is free of accelerations, that is free of forces, and developed out of this the general theory of relativity. Unfortunately he made a lapse: he forgot, that a reference body must not only be acceleration-free, but also motion-free!

The fall curve visible from the earth's surface is fictitious. It is as fictitious as the observation that the sun revolves around the earth. The Earth's surface is far from being able to detect absolute movements of objects in the cosmos, that means to be a reference point for the physically mechanic of the world. Technically, however, the earth's surface can be taken as it only calculates with incremental difference values and non-absolute values.
The absolute way of the jumper is relation to the ether as the fixpoint of the world,  made visible by the red line. So although the geodesic of the jumper is the parabola from Earth's point of view, in reality he only moved on the straight path on the red line. This distance is therefore the shortest possible between jump and dive into the water. By this pragmatically mathematical (ie without a physical bottom of the pants) was created the so-called minimal-motion theory for gravitation according to Hamilton's principle. Their results are correct, but without the knowledge of why.

The ether is the zero point of the world! Only movements towards him are all that happens in the cosmos by Newtonian physics. And: there is no other physics than Newtonian physics. Gravitative processes, that is falling on celestial bodies, are movements of the ether, that is, that is of the fixed point of the world.