The bigest Lie in modern Physics
In sciencemag.org is
Four cesium beam clocks flown around the world on
commercial jet flights during October 1971, once eastward and once
westward, recorded directionally dependent time differences which are
in good agreement with predictions of conventional relativity theory.
Relative to the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory, the
flying clocks lost 59 ± 10 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and
gained 273 ± 7 nanoseconds during the westward trip, where the errors
are the corresponding standard deviations. These results provide an
unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with
opinion to the Hafele-Kaeting experiment is a pure assertion, there are
no references to any data. Are made experiments, so must be
compared the results with predictions.
Where are the predicted values for this experiment?
They are hidden.
Because they do not fit.
special theory of relativity says explicitly, that the time dilations of
the clocks in the aircrafts to the East and the West must have the same size. But the measured values are most importantly different and contrary!
true is: the time dilation in the aircraft to the east is, as expected,
higher, but in the aircraft to the West lower: the clock runs faster
than the base time. This is a very great sensation that must be hidden!
the results of these experiment will identify the special and in
consequence the general relativity too as principle wrong. And that may
not be because it should not be.
Because the lie in the statemant is not allowed to be visible, confusions are installed.
1) A conventional special relativity theory is not exist, the special relativity is a conventional theory.
und "gained" are no defined physical expressions. These expressions are
intended only to prevent, that positiv and negativ will be visible.
3) The problem is not how accurate are the values. Therefore is the question for the standard deviations uninteresting.
"Unambiguous empirical" means that the measured values have to predict the values of the experiment, but they did not confirm that in the remotest degree.
4) The clock paradox requires no new confirmation, it is safely exist. Without it there would not exist the special relativity.
should also be measured in this case only too. If any one had
anticipated, that the result were so, how it was, no one had been
allowed to make it.
5) Are the cesium beam clocks macroscopic clocks?
The special relativity knows no differenz between smal and big clocks.
Time dilation is the same for atomic clocks and Cuckoo Clocks.
has degenerated into a religion.
these knows no mercy.