Jan Peter Apel
The End of Relativity
Physics
is the science to find the truths of nature behind its often
incomprehensible phenomena. Everything here below exclusively describes
to the truth of nature and is fully proved by measurements. In
contrast to this, all today's interpretations out of the theories of
relativity with their mathematical only extrapolations are confirmed by
not
a single one concrete measurement. Mathematics alone could
not prove any physical theories, as proved by more than four
mathematically "proven" quite different gravitational theories,
although only one can be correct.
To
properly explain the world, it is necessary to know the right view of
it. Scientifically, views are defined by coordinate systems. Correct
views, that is, correct coordinate systems, results only from the point
of reference underlying an observed natural phenomenon, where it is, as
it were, "moored". Flying refers par ecample to the air, because
without them, it would not be possible. Even the right view of the
world, which we only experience from the inside out, is only possible
from a basis that underlies it. That is to be found and represents
the absolute fixed point for nature. However, neither we, the earth nor
the sun, the Milky Way or a theoretical point is this required fixed
point, which in particular do'nt have any movements. Whether a thing
moves or not, neither we nor the earth nor the sun or the galaxy do
decide, but only the basis of the world which we must find. These
is to be found and represents the absolute fixed point for them.
However, neither we, the earth nor the sun, the Milky Way or a
theoretical point is this required fixed point, which particular do'nt
have any movements. Whether a thing moves or not, neither we nor the
earth nor the sun or the galaxy do decide, but only the basis of the
world which we must find.
Einstein believed that he had found
the fixed point of the world in a freely falling body, because such a
body is completely free of Newton's forces acting on it, that is to say
without acceleration. That it has additional uniform Newtonian
movements, he did not notice. Einstein, in spite of its falling motion,
rated the gravitational movements of his body, which is only free of
forces, as the reference, that is, the fixed point of the world.
The
fact, that Einstein's fixed point moves, is, of course, a paradox,
which
is why no general understanding has been formed for it. Since the view
from a moving location, here from Einstein's falling body, is called
relative and Einstein's fixed point, the force-free body, moves, the
description of the world was called from this perspective with "theory
of relativity". This, however, was contrary to Einstein's
understanding, because he gave the force-free body the status as an
absolute fixed point, so that the theory would have to be an absolutely
theory.
Because
Einstein's free-falling body is "steered" by gravitational causes,
Einstein's general theory of relativity is also considered a "theory of
gravitation." Einstein wanted to develop it into a "general theory of
the world" with
a concluding world formula. But to this day also his successors can not
succeed, so that at the beginning of the 21st century in the weekly
magazine wrote "Die Zeit" (Germany) an article with the title "Aus, die
Physik ist am Ende" ("Physics
is at the End"). Einstein's physics is at the end, since no
more can come out than at the beginning was put into it. Mathematics
can not find nature "things", only extrapolate from initial
conditions, but always connected to its beginnings.
Einstein
described the world with the "fixed point" as a body, that is only free
of forces. But not in concrete geometrical pictures, but by means of
abstract mathematical calculations, which needs more than three
dimensions, because the special relativity says, that light is
absolut and simultaneously relativ constantly.
Since this math was
new and extremely complicated at the time, the tale arose that only a
few people in the world could understand. Due to the expanded knowledge
of mathematics, this Einsteinian "view" of the world based on
gravitational geodesics (fall curves) is now unspectacular and normally
manageable for scientists, but still not translatable into real
three-dimensional images.
Synonymous
with the indescribability of
the mathematical content of the general theory of relativity arised the
concept of "space-time", in which a force-free body moves straight
ahead and with constant velocity, even though it moves on a crooked
course of uneven speed, viewed from the ground. Space-time is an
interpretation out of the mathematical equations of Einstein's
mathematics of the general theory of relativity in order to be able to
present something that seems real out of them.
But how will be evaluate interpretations out of mathematical
formulations, in this case unintentionally but aptly, said Josef
Honerkamp in "Was können wir wissen" (What can we know), 2013, so very
up to date, Page. 209:
“At
this level (the verbal)
laymen and not directly involved professional
scientists can have a say. Of course
they have a handicap: how the people in Platon's allegory of the cave
they see only the schemes of the theory, can never rely on the
equations, can not judge how good they describe the phenomena and what
in statements from experts about these mathematical `theories´ is
already interpretation.“
According
to this, physical interpretations are only non-binding statements about
that, what is `as truth' in mathematical equations. Which `truths' are
in Einstein's equations? It can only be those what have been brought in
with the initial assumptions of their origin. These are that light is
at the same time absolutely as relatively constant and a force-free
body is the fixed point of the world. But both are not truths.
Absolute
and simultaneous relative constancy of a real movement speed is not
possible in a three-dimensional space. So, the world would have to be
over dimensionally.
For overdimensionalitis and some other theories out of the relativities
there are still today not a single explicit proof of its presence in nature!
The
relativity theories are wrong. And this proves just the
Michelson-Morley experiment with its measured value of a very small
ether wind, arising as a wind due to the Earth's peripheral speed of
around 400 m / s. Einstein concluded by the undetected wind with a
speed of the earth around the sun of 30,000 m / s that the ether do not
exist. But it exist. Having found a thing is the conclusive proof of
its existence, not having found a thing is by no means proof of its
nonexistence!
The second proof of the ether, independent of the
Michelson-Morley measurement, is provided by the Hafele-Keating
experiment, which results in even opposite changes in the time
dilatations in airplanes orbiting Earth in the west and east
directions. These changes against the clocks on the earth's surface can
not be explained by the special theory of relativity, so it is directly
refuted.
Different time dilations also mean correspondingly
different speeds of the aircrafts, but they do not have in relation to
the earth's surface. But they have them with respect to the ether,
which does not join the Earth's rotation, otherwise the measured ether
wind by the Michelson-Morley experiment could not be measured.
With
these truths also arises: Time dilations arise causally by movement
speeds compared to the ether. They are, as follows, the absolute
measure of speeds.
Furthermore, Einstein's
force-free body can not be a fixed point of the world. A fixed point
must be not only forcefree, but also free of movements. That is, a body
is only a fixed point if it has no Newtonian movements too. When is
that the case?
Every body moving on a curved path located in a
gravitational field has a Newtonian motion to the side. Only when it
falls vertically* on a straight line it does not have Newtonian
motions to the side.
* Vertical is defined here with respect to the
starry sky and not with respect to the rotating surfaces of celestial
bodies, because these have a lateral movement.
However, a force-free body falling perpendicularly without sideways motion can also have a vertical Newtonian motion
How can that be determined?
Newtonian
movements arise only through previous accelerations against the inertia
of the mass of bodies. Out of this arise the following consideration:
in an otherwise completely empty room, a small body is at rest. Now, at
a great distance, a large body, e.g. the earth will added, also without
movement, so even at rest. The gravitational effects of these bodies
ultimately bring both together. The earth moves imperceptibly, while
the small body falls onto it with the so-called escape velocity. Having
never been accelerated against inertia by any external Newtonian force,
the body has only gravitational velocity without a Newtonian share
of moving.
Only that body, that exactly falls with the escape velocity perpendicular to the starry sky,
represents* the fixed point of the world.
Only it is free of Newtonian accelerations and movements!
*
"Represents" therefore, because it is not the falling body that is the
fixed point of the world, but that in which it is and from which it is
only taken. And that is the ether, that fills the entire space of the
universe down into atoms. And the earth eats this ether! Why, is still
unknown. But our children also want later to have something to explore. The
ether flowing into the earth causes the phenomena of gravitation and
also causes the so-called gravitational time dilation on the surface of
the earth. And that fits exactly to the escape velocity, with which the
ether flows into the earth. This is the proof of the inflow of ether
into the earth, it is a vertical ether wind. This vertical ether wind
prevents that ether wind, that is presupposed for the Michelson-Morley
experiment as measuring theory.
So follows, that gravitational
motions are movements of the ether and Newtonian motions which are such
against the ether. Movements in three-dimensional space thus consist of
the sum of gravitational and Newtonian movements. How can they be
distinguished or separated? With the help of the time dilation.
Time
dilation arises only by previously occurred Newtonian acceleration.
Against Newtonian accelerations, masses defend themselves with their
inertia. Why is also still unknown, but: masses defend themselves
against accelerations only if they have to change their speeds compared
to the ether and only thereby time dilatations arise. Time dilations
are thus the absolute measure of Newtonian speeds. The passage of time
within matter (eg the number of orbits of electrons around their atomic
nuclei per second), measurable in light emanating from it, has the
fastest possible value if a body has no velocity according to Newtonian
physics, that is none towards the ether.
A body with escape speed
vertically falling against the starry sky
has no time dilation because it has no
speed against the ether,
so with respect to the fixed point of the world.
The consequences:
with
only a gravitationally vertical falling fixed point without any
Newtonian movements no space curvatures can result, as they are
interpreted from the theories of relativity! They do not exist either.
Since
the light is vibrations of the ether like sound vibrations of the air,
the ether is also the zero point of the speed of light. Of course,
light rises more slowly against the incident ether current from the
earth, resulting in the detected wavelength increases towards the top.
Even
horizontally, it moves faster towards the east and slower towards the
west. This is proven by the Michelson Morley experiment and the Hafele
Kaeting experiment. In the Michelson Morley experiment, the value
measured from the peripheral velocity of the earth's surface of about
400 m / s was simply swept under the table compared to the desired one
of about 30,000 m / s.
There are no oversizes.
The world is as three-dimensional as it looks
and all the phenomena in it do explain
by the basis of the world, the ether
as a substance out of any inertial masses.
The
relativity theories are physically no theories. Only mathematicians
give them this status. A physical theory is defined exclusively by a
verbal explanation of a concrete natural phenomenon by means of a
cause-and-effect principle occurring in it. None of these contain the
theories of relativity. Physical theories have something to explain and
provide answers. Mathemaik can never explain anything, that is only verbally possible. Mathematics can only describe what looks like, but not how and
why it works.
Truths about the world are only verbally possible with the real things of nature which interacts by cause-and-effect principles.
Einstein
was right to assume the fixed point of the world in the state of a
falling body. Unfortunately, he overlooked the fact, that a body free
of forces, that is free of acceleration, is not enough, that the body
can show the fixed point.
One
believed Einsteins faulty fixed point,
but not his right knowledge about the origin of our weight on the
earth's surface as an acceleration from the bottom up, measurable
with each accelerometer. He himself but no too, because he was looking
for a gravitational force up to his end, although it is not needed for
the weight and Newton himself predicted the impossibility of a
gravitian force.
The
theories of relativity are to be eliminat without substitution, because
they are wrong. What remains, is the existence of time dilation, which
was discovered by Josef Larmor before Einstein. The task of the special
theory of relativity as a physical theory would have been to explain
the time dilation in origin and effect. Instead, it only gives
instructions for mathematical formulations to account the resulting
relativistic effects.
We have to accept our world with the
paradox of a seemingly moving fixed point in the form of the ether, it
is and has the power to be the absolute fixed point for EVERYTHING. To
term "theory of relativity" is wrong, it would presuppose that we(!) are
the absolute reference point. We should finally realize that we are just
a plaything of nature and our view is often the absolute wrong.
Relative has the meaning of wrong and can not be term for right.
Physics has to be exact, so colloquial has nothing to do in it, only
the absolute is right. The "basis" of the world is the ether, from
which, according to Josef Larmor, matter first emerged.
Thankfully,
we live in a place that is geometrically quiet except for the Earth's
movements to the sky, so that the cosmos is easy to observe.
Functionally, however, we find ourselves in an ether flow (escape
velocity, therefore also with its time dilation) and an accelerated
state, as our weight shows.
The cosmos is geometrically exactly as
it looks. All fantasies out of the relativity theories such as space
curvatures and space-time and overdimensions are nonsense. All
the phenomena of the world are explainable without the theories of
relativity, by principle simple and understandable cause-and-effect
principles.
Physical theories are only correct then
if everything fits together without exception!
And that's only the case by the ether theory.
The relativity theories are the biggest fallacy ever!