To
win 5000 Euro!
see
below
Jan
Peter Apel
The
World's Mechanics
The
world is today tried to explain with two theories. The little one of
the world is explained by the quantum mechanics. The big one
of
the world is tried to explaine by the relativity theories, but they can
not explain a single one concrete phenomenon from cause to effect whith
a principle. They provide exclusively mathematical formulations, from
which interpretations emerge, which up to this day, over 100 years(!),
can't be confirmed by anything re-measurable such as for space time.
The biggest problem, however, is, that both, the small and the bigof
the world do not match, although a great always must be the sum of its
little one. The known knowledges about the small of the world is
experimentally proven, the knowledges about the big of the world not.
So the theories for the great, the relativity theories, are false.
The
special and the general theory of relativity, from which no ordinary
citizen can make a meaningful idea of what it is supposed to be, stands
on two pillars: peculiar constancy of the speed of light,
namely
based to any body moving freely, and a reference point for movements
represented by a force-free body.
Both foundations, which are the
mathematical initial conditions of the theories of relativity, come
from only one experiment, the famous Michelson-Morley experiment of
1887. Control experiments with other measurement theories were not
made. The experiment measured the difference of the speed of light in
the direction of the motion of the earth around the sun and
transversely, what should confirm the existence of the ether. The
result was nearly zero despite the expected difference of about 30,000
m / s. However, it was not concretely zero, but a very small measured
value was reproducibly present. From the impossibility of an
explanation of this smal value, it was ignored and out of the great
"non"-value was concluded, that there is no ether and light hits every
body whith light speed, regardless of whether a body is moving against
or away from the light. Concrete measurements, which are confirmed in
detail, are not yet available.
In 1971 an experiment was made
out of curiosity by Hafele and Keating. The result was just as
surprising as the Michelson Morley experiment. Since then it is hold
under the ceiling and will be seen through rose-coloured lenses to
damage not the theory of relativities, look at "The bigest lie in
modern physics". The experiment should, based on
the time dilatation, measure clocks in airplanes, which traveled whith
same velocities in the east and west direction around the world, how
much they loses time. Instead
the results showed in the west direction an even triple increase of
time as the predicted only decrease of the clocks in both directions by
the speciel relativity.
The result of the experiment can only be
explained by the fact, that the velocities of the airplanes from which
the time dilatations result are not based to the earth's surface, but
to the starry sky. With the view from the starry sky the theory of
relativity would also lead to the correct result. But the relativity
theories do not know an external reference point, but only two involved
objects, in this case only the clock in an airplane and the comparison
clock on the ground. Relativity
theories imply, that everything is relative, from only one to only one
other object. If the other object, the reference clock, would be placed
on a fixed star in the sky and would be simultaneously the movement
reference point, "everything would be right". But it would be just a
coincidence.
The Hafele-Keating experiment has unintentionally
become to a control experiment to the Michelson-Morley experiment and
disproved definitely the special relativity
The
clocks in the airplanes in their boxes do not know anything about a
starry sky, nevertheless in their timelines they follow it. That
is only understandable, if something is in the watches, which is
connected with the starry sky. And this something has to be materially
(there are no spirits!).
The
highest law in nature is:
All is materially!
Only a materially thing can tell the
clocks in the aircrafts that and how fast they move. And
this thing exists: it is
the ether, which Einstein, because of his interpretation of the
Michelson-Morley experiment, banished from physics. This is why physics
is been in the deadlock since
decades.
The
truth is: speed, and thus also time dilation, refer to the ether as the
substance filling the entire space of the universe up into the atoms.
It is indeed non-material, but contains much energy. This energy is
real measured as "energy of the vacuum".
Light also has its
velocity against the ether, since it is vibrations of the ether like
sound vibrations of the air. Light hits, of course, with the respective
speed difference to moving objects; otherwise, wheel measurements would
not be possible; no Doppler effect could occur. The created
"relativistic" Doppler effect for light does not exist, it has no
natural basis from a cause to an effect, it is a purely mathematical
creation.
The
vacuum in space is not nothing, but the origin of the world, the ether.
Only out of it the matter emerged, so Joseph Larmor predicted.
The
errors in the theories of
relativity.
Firstly,
the speed of light is not constant to bodies, but to the ether, which
the Hafele-Keating and the Michelson-Morley experiment (out of its
small measured value from the peripheral velocity of the earth's
surface) and the functioning of an interferometer fiber-optic
gyroscope (IFOG), which can not explain by the Einstein guided science have definitely
proved.
Therefore the first pillar of the theories of relativity is gone. Secondly,
a reference point for movements itself must not have any movements. Einstein's
only forceless, that is only acceleration free, body can still have
movements. It does
not have movements only then, if it is in rest against the ether. No
movement against the ether is also no time dilation. No
time dilation has a body near the earth only then, if it fall
vertically with the speed of flight to the earth's surface, but without
following the earth rotation (only the very small part of the
Lense-Tirring effect).This
body has the fastest possible time of the cosmos, which can be regarded
as a natural constant. Einstein's force-free, ie without accelerations,
body is gone too as the second pillar of the theories of relativity.
Einstein
was correct with his idea, that a force-free body has a special state
in the direction of an absolute fixed point. But the fact that it is
the true zero point only then, if it is among accelerating also must be
free of movements, he did not think. This is also due to the fact, that
the misinterpretation of the result of the Michelson-Morley experiment
does not allow any definition for absolute movements, everything would
be only relative.
Whether
something is moving or not, decide another body. If there is no one, a
body does not know whether it is moving or not. Every body, however,
knows very well whether and how fast it moves. That tells it its
remeasurable time dilation and its previously given Newtonian
acceleration against
its mass inertia.
Gravitational
accelerations, ie falling accelerations, are not accelerations of the
bodies against their masses, which is why we do not feel any
acceleration when we jumping into the pool, but they are accelerations
of the ether, in which bodies are only "constituents," according to
Larmor only "another form of the ether." This shows that the ether
flows into the earth, to which we say gravitation. This vertical inflow
of the ether into the Earth's surface is the reason why the
Michelson-Morley experiment did not detect an "ether wind" from the
orbital velocity of the Earth around the Sun. In the vertical, the
Michelson-Morley experiment would measure the escape speed of the
earth. In the horizontal direction it measured the weak wind of ether,
which results from the rotation of the earth on its surface and led to
the inexplicably small measured value.
Overdimensions
result in the general theory of relativity by the error, that the
velocity of incidence of the light on moving bodies would be always the
speed of light. This is not possible in three geometrically spatial
dimensions and space curvatures result from the assumption that the
curved curves of bodies are in fact Newton's straight line of inertia.
Mathematics shouted "Hurray, I can calculate it all" and became to the
leader in physics. The calculations with the theories of
relativity for its view of the things are mostly right, but not always,
what, however, theories idenitfy as false.in their entirety. There are
no overdimensions and space curvatures, they are only interpretative
outcomes of mathematical excursions on the basis of two false
assumptions.
"The
calculations are right," is the only argument that supports the
relativity theories. However, calculations are also correct for false
theories, already alone for gravitation more than four! With these
false theories, space probes are successfully emitted from the earth.
But, for every natural phenomenon, so also for gravitation, only one
theory can be correct. And these must first of all say why the
gravitational effect decreases with the square of the distance, and, of
course, what is gravitation at all. Mathematics has no rules for right
and wrong, which has only physics, whereby their few known rules are
simply ignored.
Gravitation is flow of ether into celestrial
bodies, look at "Gravitation." Therefore, the effect (flow rate) also
decreases quadratically to the distance. This is shown
experimentally directly by the fact, that the wavelength of vertically
rising light increases, because the "wind" of the ether as the oscillating medium of the light decreases with
increasing height. There can be no so-called "gravitational" time
dilation. Every natural phenomenon, even the time dilatation, has only
one cause, and that is movement against the ether. A movement against
the ether is also present on the surface of the earth, which is
vertically in rest, but the ether flows through it. So the earth's
surface has a time dilatation at exactly the height, which results from
the escape speed. And this even calculates the general theory of
relativity correctly, but it does not know this, so that it is
ultimately only a coincidence.
The
theories of relativity lapse without substitute. Also because they are
no theories at all, but only mathematical treatises for a virtual
nature based on false foundations. Physics is to find theories which,
by definition, can primarily answer the pivotal questions: "Which
natural phenomenon works from which cause to which effect according to
which principle?".
Calculations of natural phenomena can be
made from the naked correlations of their involved physical variables
without knowing the functionisms of the phenomena. This has nothing to
do with physics, can at most be called a technique.
In this world, Newton's
physics is the only one, and there is no other.
Newton,
however, did not now anything from time dilatation, because it becomes
really noticeable only at higher speeds. The influence of time dilation
into the Newtonian physics, which is termed "relativistic", takes place
with the relativistic factor.
The relativistic
factor.
With
the relativistic factor gamma, also called the Lorentz factor,
calculations for moving natural phenomena are brought to quantitatively
correct results. It has emerged purely mathematically, without a
physical foundation. He can not make any physical statements such as
"When is a nature event relativistic or what is relativistic?"
The
design of this factor is also alien to nature. At a speed of infinity,
its value is one and at a speed of zero it is zero. Where in the nature
is a speed of infinity? It is impossible to make understandable
statements from this purely mathematical definition of the factor and
generate general rule, when to use it where and how.
All
phenomena of nature are materially. This also applies to the time
dilation, without it there would be no relativism. Time dilation is a
mechanical process. Time dilatation occurs, because the revolutions of
an electron, representing the natures clock, have to move independently
to the nucleus by itself against the ether, who fills out the whole
univers (see "Animation time dilation"). The orbits of the electrons in
an atom let the atom "live". The electrons, however, must, in addition
to their orbits, also participate in the forward movements of the atom
in relation to the ether, so that their speed-supply of light-velocity
remains less for the orbits. At light speed nothing more, the clock in
matter stopped, the matter is dead, even radioactive processes in it
stopped. This is the functionism of time dilation. One revolution of an
electron around the atomic nucleus is a unit of time which also
corresponds to a constant mechanical progress in the atom as well as in
nerves and largest engines. The revolutions of the electrons around
their atomic nuclei are the "driving pinions" of the nature!
Time
dilation is not only a view of differently moved other bodies. Time
dilation is an absolute material mechanical process. A meaningfully
factor for this must lead to the deceleration of the time. So it must
be one when at movement of zero and zero at the speed of light, all
against the ether. Only in this way does a physical factor reflect the
nature truly.
The
formula for the time slowed by the time dilation is: The relativistic
time is equal to the zero time (without time dilation) times the
physical relativistic factor. The historically created factor by Larmor
and Lorentz is the physically non-meaningful reciprocal value, with
which true thinking is not possible.
Time, too, is a thing in
nature, namely change. What philosophers think about time has no effect
in nature. In it applies, if nothing changes, there is no time. Time is
not an abstract thing, which works ghostly in everything. Time
and thus also time dilation is a purely mechanical process and
therefore also bound to matter! A geometric space can not have time.
What is "relativistic"?
Relativistic
is the time, nothing else. Time passes in a body or inertial system at
there standstill against the ether with a maximum value and at light
speed with a value of zero. There are neither relativistic functions
nor relativistic things. Because at every movements against the ether
as the fixed point of the world time dilatation arises, all processes
in the cosmos are fundamentally relativistic.
That means nothing else as, that relativistic is the normal in nature.
How does the physics look for this?
The physical variable time contains always
the zero time (without time dilation) times the physical relativistic
factor. Both belong together like action and reaction. In all the
formulas of Newton's physics, the time must be applied
with the relativistic factor.
To
assign the relativistic factor to other physical variables, nature does
not allow. There is neither a length contraction nor a mass
multiplication. Both are mathematical "products" out of ignorance,
where the relativistic factor belongs, that is only where it arises. In
reality, only the travel times are always the same, and the propulsion
units slows down, at light speed to a standstill, to accelerate always
equal masses further. There are no overdimensiones and space
curvatures, both are results of mathematical excursions on the basis of
two false assumptions.
There is no non-relativistic and
relativistic physics, ie for example, no non-relativistic and
relativistic impulse. There is only Newtonian physics with the time
sequences, which possess the involved objects or inertial systems. This
means, that Newtonian physics is fundamentally relativistic. For
example, the impulse of a particle in an accelerator is determined by
Newtonian physics as mass times its velocity at which the time is
affected by the relativistic factor. The Newtonian velocity ranges from
zero to infinity. For a body with the maximum possible absolute
velocity of light speed against
the ether, it is an infinite Newtonian speed and an
infinite impulse.
All formulas of Newton's physics remain unchanged
throughout the universe, with time being always linked with the
relativistic factor. It can only be left out if the accuracy is
sufficient without it, but this is the case for all technical processes
on the earth.
Newton's assumption to a cosmos in which runs a
"unitary time" for everything is correct for the cosmes (its age), but
not for objects or inertial systems in it. Ihere times are the ones,
which arise out of the time dilation.according to their speeds against
the ether.
The value of the physical
relativitic factor gamme.
The
basis of thought is an atom, whose electrons revolutions forms the
time. For a better thinking, the electrons revolves around the nucleus
as a helix around the straight orbit of the moving atom. Would the
electrons not orbiting the atomic nucleus transversely to the direction
of the nukleus, they must overtake the nucleus and then fall back
again, what leads to the same result. The orbital duration is longer on
the helical path because the orbital path becomes longer.
This results in the following diagram.
The ordinate represents the movement speed of an object. The radius of
the unit circle corresponds to the speed of light, which is the
electron velocity on the screw line. On the abscissa, the reduced
orbiting speed (dashed vector) is shown. This relative to the speed of
light is the physical relativistic factor.
The historical (doctrinal) mathematical relativistic factor gamma is
the physically not usable reciprocal, in which the cosine is expressed
by Pythagoras, thus obscuring any natural origin.
The velocity of the electron from the speed of light is divided into
the vector translational motion of the atom on the ordinate, and the
rotatory of the electron around the atomic nucleus on the
abscissa.
The result:
The mechanical world is so incomprehensibly simple behind its often so
mysterious phenomena.
The
physically highest possible criterion for the correctness of this
theory, that everything fits together without any complications, is
fulfilled for this world mechanics. The problem of the incompatibility
of the big (relativity theory) with the small (quantum mechanics) does
not exist at all!
The realization of Paul Dirac (Nobel Prize 1933), that a physical
theory is either simple (this world mechanics) or false (Theorie of
relativity) is confirmed as well as the prediction from Richard Feynman
(Nobel Prize 1965):"... that physics ultimately
does not need mathematics, that finally the "machinery of the nature"
will come to light and the laws will be as simple as the rules of the
seemingly complex chess game".
The macro
world is exactly so how it looks like:
simple three-dimensional.
Their
functionism runs in different inertial systems
differently quickly according to simple cause-effect principles,
understandible for everyone with interest.
But the world is not yet fully explained.
As far as the macro cosmos is concerned, the next to be solved puzzle
of mechanics is: "What is mass inertia"? The solution is probably to be
found as an interaction with the ether, which must finally be
researched. A help is in nuclear engineering to find.
It is also necessary to research, why the Newtonian impulse depends on
the relativistic time, but this is also probably related to mass
inertia.
Whoever is the first to make this mechanical world of the world by the rules of physics to
shatter in its foundations, receives from me during my lifetime a
premium of
5000 €
Refutations with mathematics are ruled out. Mathematics can only open
up possibilities, but never decide whether these exist. Refutations
must disprove the physical principles I used.